
Do you believe in bad luck?...

No idea, apparently NASA calculated it. I leached the figure from the media.jackssmirkingrevenge wrote:That probability seems a bit high, given area of average person vs earth's surface area, and that people are not fixed objects and can be in any number of places at any given time... or is that a 1/3200 chance of landing in a populated area? Still seems a little off.
Bad luck/good luck/curses only effect you when you believe in it. You think you're unlucky; you see bad luck in all your actions. Same if you think you're lucky or cursed.Do you believe in bad luck?
Granted if it is going to fall within a predictable band as opposed to "anywhere on earth" then the odds go up. Of a 3200 mile long strip, it sounds likely that one mile of it will be populated.Technician1002 wrote:Those along the path during re-entry have lower odds than I do.
To believe in luck would be like be believing in fate/destiny and a higher power. May as well believe in leprechauns, celestial teapots, invisible dragons and epoxy bat caves*.
Do you think I travel to little children's bedrooms around Easter time and extrude epoxy eggs from one of my orifices*I just spoiled Christmas for all the little Spudfilers who believe in the Epoxy Bunny
That's terrible to read. The proximity of the Vatican is no coincidence.This is sad, continues the age old history of Italians prosecuting legitimate scientists. I've heard bad stories about Italian authorities who are 'delusional' with certain beliefs that affect their judgement.
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
It was a ''second cut file'' and you need to take your time, to get it perfect, you get pretty worn out after that too.Zeus wrote:5 hours to remove that much steel, I guess he had you using dead smooth files![]()
Good call on the surface grinder, but remember he was teaching you a lesson in patience, wax on, wax off etc...
umm still pretty expensive, ill look into reloading my self, we have been getting our uncle to reload the .22-250. I wanna buy a new gun if you didn't notice. Something for roos, deer, feral pig sized animals.Zeus wrote:Fair enough with the 2nd cut, I'd be using a bastard to rough it out then a 2nd cut or finer to finish it.
.223 rem, I'd hazard a guess at 75 cents apiece, I've seen a box of 20 for $15, a Lee Loader is a really worthwhile investment, makes it so much cheaper.
12 gauge shells are $12.50 for 25, might be cheaper to take up clay target.
What happened to the Dam Buster?MrCrowley wrote:Edit 2:
2007 I made the SGA (first piston cannon)
2008 I made the VAL (better built piston cannon)
2009 I made the M480 (first hybrid)
2010 I made Mjollnir (first piston hybrid)
Its some where around $5-$20 per .50 cal here in bama. I would know, I got to shoot a barret on the condition that I bought the ammo.... It was well worth it though.Crna Legija wrote: do you know the price of .223 round by any chance? my bro has a 22 250 and its like $1.10 a round
How very on-topicLabtecpower wrote:I think i'll go the hybrid cartridge route.
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
The only large metal part would probably be a gas engine, as batteries are not as efficient as traditional fuel (think about energy density)...making it "stealthy"
that's why I am surprised... ardupilot pretty much already has all of the features that that guy couldn't do on his ownyou can see why they clamped down on this. I digress, don't want to find myself on some watch list