Humphrey qe5, super qev!!!

Show us your pneumatic spud gun! Discuss pneumatic (compressed gas) powered potato guns and related accessories. Valve types, actuation, pipe, materials, fittings, compressors, safety, gas choices, and more.
jeepkahn
Corporal 3
Corporal 3
Posts: 747
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2009 1:11 pm
Location: Triad, NC, USA

Thu Feb 12, 2009 9:11 pm

Anybody here used them before???
Holy crap is this thing fast... It's 3/4" and using it to pilot my 4" chamber modular/toolie cannon, it is faster with a schrader valve than the 3/4" atlas qev I've got on the golfball cannon with a modded garden sprayer(and before you say it's because the pilot volume is smaller,both cannons have the same qev pilot setup, and both qevs have the exact same pilot set-up, 3/4" Tee, one leg to qev, one to the garden sprayer, and one to a reducer with a schrader for filling), I can't tell a differance in speed between piloting with the schrader or the sprayer, but I'm sure the sprayer is a hair quicker, the way I found out it would fire with the schrader is because it fired when I tried to check the filled pressure, the specs on this thing say it will work with as little as 1 psi differance between chamber and pilot... And the supply house in NC sales them for 32 USD a piece, compared to 26 usd for the atlas's from fastenal....

if you google humphrey qe5 you'll see the one I've got...
grumpy
Specialist 3
Specialist 3
Posts: 331
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 7:48 am
Location: tampa,fla.

Thu Feb 12, 2009 9:25 pm

and mcmaster sells them for $21.00.
jeepkahn
Corporal 3
Corporal 3
Posts: 747
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2009 1:11 pm
Location: Triad, NC, USA

Thu Feb 12, 2009 9:29 pm

grumpy wrote:and mcmaster sells them for $21.00.
the humphrey's???
grumpy
Specialist 3
Specialist 3
Posts: 331
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 7:48 am
Location: tampa,fla.

Thu Feb 12, 2009 9:31 pm

yep humphrey's. part # 6646K23
User avatar
Gippeto
First Sergeant 3
First Sergeant 3
Venezuela
Posts: 2504
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 10:14 am
Location: Soon to be socialist shit hole.
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 17 times

Donating Members

Thu Feb 12, 2009 10:58 pm

DOH!!! :cussing: :banghead:
"It could be that the purpose of your life is to serve as a warning to others" – unknown

Liberalism is a mental disorder, reality is it's cure.
jeepkahn
Corporal 3
Corporal 3
Posts: 747
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2009 1:11 pm
Location: Triad, NC, USA

Fri Feb 13, 2009 12:40 pm

Gippeto wrote:DOH!!! :cussing: :banghead:
facepalmheaddesk!!!

But, at least I get them same day... :lol:
PVC Arsenal 17
Staff Sergeant 3
Staff Sergeant 3
Posts: 1762
Joined: Mon Mar 27, 2006 4:18 pm
Location: United States

Fri Feb 13, 2009 12:47 pm

grumpy wrote:yep humphrey's. part # 6646K23
Wrong. McMaster's 3/4" QEV is made by Deltrol.
User avatar
Lentamentalisk
Sergeant 3
Sergeant 3
Posts: 1202
Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2007 5:27 pm
Location: Berkeley C.A.

Fri Feb 13, 2009 1:24 pm

Ya, the McMaster ones look terrible, and are not the special design that the humphreys are. I don't know what the real difference is, and their effective operating pressures, as well as how easily the humphreys are, but the McMasters are definitely a lower quality.
Do not look back, and grieve over the past, for it is gone;
Do not be troubled about the future, for it has not yet come;
Live life in the present, and make it so beautiful that it will be worth remembering.
jeepkahn
Corporal 3
Corporal 3
Posts: 747
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2009 1:11 pm
Location: Triad, NC, USA

Fri Feb 13, 2009 1:38 pm

The humphrey actuates with a 1 psi, pressure change, in other words even a tiny leak will cause a premature firing... As evidenced by how quick it fired merely using a schrader valve to pilot it, and approx 2.5"ci of pilot volume and 80 psi...
grumpy
Specialist 3
Specialist 3
Posts: 331
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 7:48 am
Location: tampa,fla.

Fri Feb 13, 2009 2:00 pm

PVC Arsenal 17 wrote:
grumpy wrote:yep humphrey's. part # 6646K23
Wrong. McMaster's 3/4" QEV is made by Deltrol.
i stand corrected, sorry for the mis information, i'll not be making anymore posts in this forum.
User avatar
pizlo
Corporal 3
Corporal 3
Posts: 783
Joined: Fri Dec 22, 2006 7:27 pm
Contact:

Fri Feb 13, 2009 9:30 pm

Rofl it looks nothing like the MCmaster ones at all, least not on the webpages. This one looks pretty sexy...
PVC Arsenal 17
Staff Sergeant 3
Staff Sergeant 3
Posts: 1762
Joined: Mon Mar 27, 2006 4:18 pm
Location: United States

Sat Feb 14, 2009 12:29 am

Lentamentalisk wrote:Ya, the McMaster ones look terrible, and are not the special design that the humphreys are. I don't know what the real difference is, and their effective operating pressures, as well as how easily the humphreys are, but the McMasters are definitely a lower quality.
I wouldn't be so quick to say they're terrible just based on looks. I've had good experiences with mine...

BTW- wouldn't you say "resident tinkerer" is a bit of a dumb label for yourself considering the purpose of this website and the people who frequent it? Mostly all of us here are tinkerers.
User avatar
Lentamentalisk
Sergeant 3
Sergeant 3
Posts: 1202
Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2007 5:27 pm
Location: Berkeley C.A.

Sat Feb 14, 2009 1:44 am

^^Its not dumb, its just repetitive, redundant, as well as stating the obvious...

Well they do look terrible. What I am talking about though is that the shuttle design of the Humphreys is specially made to increase flow and opening time, whereas the McMaster ones are a simple piston.
Looking at it the other way though, the McMaster ones are most likely far more modifiable then the Humphreys, due to how simple they are.
Do not look back, and grieve over the past, for it is gone;
Do not be troubled about the future, for it has not yet come;
Live life in the present, and make it so beautiful that it will be worth remembering.
jeepkahn
Corporal 3
Corporal 3
Posts: 747
Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2009 1:11 pm
Location: Triad, NC, USA

Sat Feb 14, 2009 11:00 am

Lentamentalisk wrote:^^Its not dumb, its just repetitive, redundant, as well as stating the obvious...

Well they do look terrible. What I am talking about though is that the shuttle design of the Humphreys is specially made to increase flow and opening time, whereas the McMaster ones are a simple piston.
Looking at it the other way though, the McMaster ones are most likely far more modifiable then the Humphreys, due to how simple they are.
Now I'm one for trying to improve something, but why by a lesser product that even modified won't outperform the one you can buy for not much more???

The more I read about the humphreys the more I like them, they did their homework, that's for sure... I have noticed that the humphreys fills faster when using the pilot as the filler... They are actually designed so that you can plug the exhaust and use it as a check valve, so they have to be designed to flow through faster...
User avatar
Lentamentalisk
Sergeant 3
Sergeant 3
Posts: 1202
Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2007 5:27 pm
Location: Berkeley C.A.

Sat Feb 14, 2009 2:17 pm

Your fill rate is much more dependent on the rate of your compressor, or some other restriction in the fill hose, than the QEV. The nice thing about the McMaster ones is that you can open them, and make a little hole in the piston, so that you can fill from the chamber side.
Do not look back, and grieve over the past, for it is gone;
Do not be troubled about the future, for it has not yet come;
Live life in the present, and make it so beautiful that it will be worth remembering.
Post Reply