Full Auto 50
- Brian the brain
- Moderator
- Posts: 3496
- Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2005 2:06 am
- Location: Holland
- Been thanked: 3 times
Offical??
What caliber is that launcher?
"Offi-cal"
Anyway..
I just showed the above video to my son....he now wants me to make a similar drum magazine for the Pnushnikov project....
Not gonna happen any time soon..
What caliber is that launcher?
"Offi-cal"
Anyway..
I just showed the above video to my son....he now wants me to make a similar drum magazine for the Pnushnikov project....
Not gonna happen any time soon..
Gun Freak wrote:
Oh my friggin god stop being so awesome, that thing is pure kick ass. Most innovative and creative pneumatic that the files have ever come by!
Can't ask for a better compliment!!
Oh my friggin god stop being so awesome, that thing is pure kick ass. Most innovative and creative pneumatic that the files have ever come by!
Can't ask for a better compliment!!
- jackssmirkingrevenge
- Five Star General
- Posts: 26183
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
- Has thanked: 547 times
- Been thanked: 326 times
Oh come on!Brian the brain wrote:Not gonna happen any time soon..
Somehow I imagine you breaking into a Dutch Natural History museum and stealing a Nautilus shell to adapt it
By the way, the name is already sort of taken...
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
- Brian the brain
- Moderator
- Posts: 3496
- Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2005 2:06 am
- Location: Holland
- Been thanked: 3 times
If I had to I'd rather break into a Austrian museum and steal a genuine Girandoni...
About the mag: How is the ammo held in, before it is placed inside the launcher?
Do you wind up the spring after it's in or lock it prior to inserting it or what??
About the mag: How is the ammo held in, before it is placed inside the launcher?
Do you wind up the spring after it's in or lock it prior to inserting it or what??
Gun Freak wrote:
Oh my friggin god stop being so awesome, that thing is pure kick ass. Most innovative and creative pneumatic that the files have ever come by!
Can't ask for a better compliment!!
Oh my friggin god stop being so awesome, that thing is pure kick ass. Most innovative and creative pneumatic that the files have ever come by!
Can't ask for a better compliment!!
Thanks very much for the compliments and encouragement. It is greatly appreciated.
It is 0.610" caliber. It can be wound up, locked, and then filled with rounds with the cover off. Or rounds can be pressed in one at a time through the "exit hole?" holding the winder between round insertions...
Still swamped with household/family duties, so please be patient with the next installment.
I picked up one of those black, Chinese QEV's but it didn't behave properly during bench testing. When I get a chance I'll reassemble everything for a drum mag test and report back with a video.
Cheers!
KB
Jack, if we can keep the air compressed, we'll be able to ward off the zombie apocalypse, mongrel hoards or those who will come after our fresh water supply.So proud this is happening on the same land mass
Thanks Matti, I looked for a piece of polycarbonate, because I too love the look of transparent parts and enjoy being able to see the mechanicalness of everything. PC would have been very expensive, and I had a chunk of AL sitting around for years. A cover could be made but would clash with everything else, which I plan on anodizing, as you suggested. A window is a good idea, I'll give it a shot, as long as I can keep it flush.you should machine the lid from transparent polycarbonate
Thanks BtB, how about "Logarithmic Spiral Guided, Spring Propelled, Projectile Advancing, Encapsulator"?Wouldn't "Nautilus" sound a bit cooler than snail??
It is 0.610" caliber. It can be wound up, locked, and then filled with rounds with the cover off. Or rounds can be pressed in one at a time through the "exit hole?" holding the winder between round insertions...
Still swamped with household/family duties, so please be patient with the next installment.
I picked up one of those black, Chinese QEV's but it didn't behave properly during bench testing. When I get a chance I'll reassemble everything for a drum mag test and report back with a video.
Cheers!
KB
- jackssmirkingrevenge
- Five Star General
- Posts: 26183
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
- Has thanked: 547 times
- Been thanked: 326 times
Bill Burr summed it up pretty nicely talking about "prepping":kustomkb wrote:Jack, if we can keep the air compressed, we'll be able to ward off the zombie apocalypse, mongrel hoards or those who will come after our fresh water supply.
Start reading up on sh;t, get some powdered food, plant some zucchini, get a windmill, right? And that’s all well and good, but if you don’t how to fight, all you are doing is gathering supplies for the toughest guy in the block, right? Just thinking about that, what am I going to do when some dude turns me upside down, start shaking the gold coins out of my pockets, I got to get a gun.
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
- Dig_Gil
- Private 2
- Posts: 36
- Joined: Wed Jan 29, 2014 6:33 am
- Location: Somewhere between Moscow and Azores
I hope I'm not late for the discussion! I feel like some holidays from my lurking job and right on time to see the Automatic fire craze catch up. I almost thought I was the only one.
First: I didn't know that youtube name's "ukiliheal" was posting around here! I guess I need to lurk archives some more...
Second: I've been analysing and experimenting with his design for a time now. I guess I must come out of the closet about that or something...
Third: Your machined parts are really nice-looking. But I recommend you to use lighter materials for pistons (less inertia, less impact, less noise, ect.). I.E. Plastics. I've been using Nylon on my builds.
Now the real replies:
This ties to my next point:
If I understand this question properly, you wonder why there is a secondary air chamber (I call it chamber to distinguish from the "reservoir", I.E. the air source). It is aparent that you don't really understand the function of a regular spud gun. All spudgun with QEV action (or similar, like the sprinkler valves) have a chamber which fills from a reservoir before shooting with a desired amount of volume to be dumped into the barrel. In Mr. Smith's design, it works as the following:
Valve closed->reservoir fills chamber.-> chamber pressure reaches the pilot release valve's trip levels.->this valve releases pilot volume, therefore triggering the main valve.->chamber pressure flows into the barrel.->because pressure is too low in the chamber now, both valves close.->risen->repeat.
In this design, the larger the chamber volume, the slower the rate of fire (it takes more time to reach tripping pressure). This is why using electronics is redundant (please take notes POLAND_SPUD). The higher the reservoir pressure the faster the chamber fills=higher ROF. Obviously, lowering the release valve's trip pressure, the higher the ROF although it costs muzzle velocity. It is my personal liking to have a very low ROF (I like my shooters manageable). But just increasing the chamber volume makes the launcher inefficient (wasted air from the reservoir which doesn't really propel the projectile) as in any pneumatic gun (although this is a debatable matter; think of this as fine-tuning a guitar). There are trade-offs, but then there are lots of options. It is advisable to use a pressure regulator if you wish. It makes the fine-tuning easier and can only add efficiency.
I could now throw up the maths I've come up about this, but better keep the post shorter until further needs.
First: I didn't know that youtube name's "ukiliheal" was posting around here! I guess I need to lurk archives some more...
Second: I've been analysing and experimenting with his design for a time now. I guess I must come out of the closet about that or something...
Third: Your machined parts are really nice-looking. But I recommend you to use lighter materials for pistons (less inertia, less impact, less noise, ect.). I.E. Plastics. I've been using Nylon on my builds.
Now the real replies:
Better get more lubricant. I guess that's obvious, but I'm not seeing it in your pictures. You could also try floating o-rings (also not sure if you're using them). And, again, lighter parts will make for less "stuckiness" due inertia.kustomkb wrote: I will need a stronger spring and probably change the piston to Delrin or something, because the bronze piston makes it feel like a bloody jack-hammer! -Very realistic for sure.
I hate it when people put batteries on things that would very well work just mechanically (pneumatically, in this case).POLAND_SPUD wrote: Seriously why waste time trying to tweak it when you can provide pulsed air supply for it with a solenoid valve. The added advantage is that you can have adjustable ROF and no compromises are needed
This ties to my next point:
I bet you already know the answers about this, but I'll elaborate my thoughts so that it might give you some insight.kustomkb wrote: Mr Smith has a PVC tank in between the air supply and the valve. Is there any need for this if you are running from an air compressor. A bit of a reservoir charging up while the gun is firing?
If I understand this question properly, you wonder why there is a secondary air chamber (I call it chamber to distinguish from the "reservoir", I.E. the air source). It is aparent that you don't really understand the function of a regular spud gun. All spudgun with QEV action (or similar, like the sprinkler valves) have a chamber which fills from a reservoir before shooting with a desired amount of volume to be dumped into the barrel. In Mr. Smith's design, it works as the following:
Valve closed->reservoir fills chamber.-> chamber pressure reaches the pilot release valve's trip levels.->this valve releases pilot volume, therefore triggering the main valve.->chamber pressure flows into the barrel.->because pressure is too low in the chamber now, both valves close.->risen->repeat.
In this design, the larger the chamber volume, the slower the rate of fire (it takes more time to reach tripping pressure). This is why using electronics is redundant (please take notes POLAND_SPUD). The higher the reservoir pressure the faster the chamber fills=higher ROF. Obviously, lowering the release valve's trip pressure, the higher the ROF although it costs muzzle velocity. It is my personal liking to have a very low ROF (I like my shooters manageable). But just increasing the chamber volume makes the launcher inefficient (wasted air from the reservoir which doesn't really propel the projectile) as in any pneumatic gun (although this is a debatable matter; think of this as fine-tuning a guitar). There are trade-offs, but then there are lots of options. It is advisable to use a pressure regulator if you wish. It makes the fine-tuning easier and can only add efficiency.
I could now throw up the maths I've come up about this, but better keep the post shorter until further needs.
- POLAND_SPUD
- Captain
- Posts: 5402
- Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 4:43 pm
- Been thanked: 1 time
So do I but experience has thought me that getting something to work by using just pneumatics or mechanically is a bit of a pain in the ass. If you can prove me wrong with a working model then go for it - I would be happy for yaI hate it when people put batteries on things that would very well work just mechanically (pneumatically, in this case).
But as I said earlier using electronics makes things easier - especially for people who don't have access to machining
Children are the future
unless we stop them now
unless we stop them now
- Dig_Gil
- Private 2
- Posts: 36
- Joined: Wed Jan 29, 2014 6:33 am
- Location: Somewhere between Moscow and Azores
Okay, you've got a point there. One just ought to remain sober about the subject for when some serious project arises.
Actually, I'm finishing a novel valve I've been cooking up which acts like the QEV/Safety Valve/Regulator in a monolithic fashion. I admit, my first attempt at it was too naive (the one I posted about in this forum), but then I got a better understanding after that. I've been taking quite the effort to make sure it was feasible and possible this time. applying mathematical models and comparing with various designs. Maybe I should have been discussing my progress with you guys, but I'm wary that it might not work. Specially after the various revisions I went through with it, I thought it would be better when I finally settle with a design. Indeed, I feel I've reached a proper design. I'm still saving details to when I see it working.
I've made it totally mechanical and actually without pilot air losses. If it works as I think it will, it is also possible to control the output pressure (think as regulated pressure) just by modifying one piston.
Actually, I'm finishing a novel valve I've been cooking up which acts like the QEV/Safety Valve/Regulator in a monolithic fashion. I admit, my first attempt at it was too naive (the one I posted about in this forum), but then I got a better understanding after that. I've been taking quite the effort to make sure it was feasible and possible this time. applying mathematical models and comparing with various designs. Maybe I should have been discussing my progress with you guys, but I'm wary that it might not work. Specially after the various revisions I went through with it, I thought it would be better when I finally settle with a design. Indeed, I feel I've reached a proper design. I'm still saving details to when I see it working.
I've made it totally mechanical and actually without pilot air losses. If it works as I think it will, it is also possible to control the output pressure (think as regulated pressure) just by modifying one piston.
Well, got a few rounds off any ways. needs a stronger spring in the drum magazine...
[youtube][/youtube]
[youtube][/youtube]
-
- Private 4
- Posts: 60
- Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2018 4:22 pm
- Been thanked: 1 time
- Contact:
Looks cool! I made (sort of) a full auto BB gun with an air compressor, a bottle, hot glue, and a thin metal tube. Unfortunately it broke so no pics.
The world is the problem, the atomic bomb is the answer!
- jackssmirkingrevenge
- Five Star General
- Posts: 26183
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
- Has thanked: 547 times
- Been thanked: 326 times
Glad this one is still alive brilliant work, both design and execution, kudos!
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
Thanks,
If I say I am going to do something, I do it. It may take five years, but it gets done.
It was hanging up, I think, because the rounds were a little too long, (Shorter would drop in clean) and drum spring pressure weak.
I can adjust the rate of fire with the variable pressure relief valve but a higher rate of fire means less power due to the volume of the ballast tank. Does that make sense? I suppose there is only so much air that can be useful depending on barrel length and bore diameters. I have the small green tank, I'll go give that a try.
If I say I am going to do something, I do it. It may take five years, but it gets done.
It was hanging up, I think, because the rounds were a little too long, (Shorter would drop in clean) and drum spring pressure weak.
I can adjust the rate of fire with the variable pressure relief valve but a higher rate of fire means less power due to the volume of the ballast tank. Does that make sense? I suppose there is only so much air that can be useful depending on barrel length and bore diameters. I have the small green tank, I'll go give that a try.