I recently filmed a test shot (no projectile, just a visual effect experiment) and captured a still from it that rather confuses me. Anyone care to explain? Based on the sheer coolness of the event, I'm going to see if I can replicate it.
Posted: Sat Dec 04, 2010 8:40 pm
by jr
could use a little more info....
what are you shooting?
Posted: Sat Dec 04, 2010 8:47 pm
by saefroch
No projectile, but a barrel full of homemade airfloat charcoal.
Posted: Sat Dec 04, 2010 9:08 pm
by Hotwired
So why does that surprise you?
It's just a pile of low mass particles, dust really, fire a pile of it out of a barrel, it hits still air and it drops dead in a sideways mushroom patten out of the barrel.
Unless you've bound the dust together the particles scatter and lose energy very rapidly.
Posted: Sat Dec 04, 2010 9:44 pm
by Technician1002
Did it eventually turn into a vortex ring?
Posted: Sat Dec 04, 2010 10:47 pm
by saefroch
It's a pile of low-mass particles, yes. They hit air, yes. But I'm pretty sure they didn't drop dead in a sideways mushroom pattern. I think they formed a sphere, since the cloud that formed afterwards was a surprisingly regular.
No, sadly it didn't turn into a vortex ring. It continued to expand outwards and quickly became irregular.
The original post has been edited to show the sequence of 4 frames I find to be most significant, as the frames after just show the cloud expanding slowly.
I think it'd also be interesting for somebody to replicate this with either high-speed, a large barrel volume, or both. The amount of airfloat charcoal I can project is limited by my barrel volume, so for me it's minimal.
Indeed, those are the shapes I'd expect, rather like a sphere with a hole being punched in the middle. But a near-perfect sphere? That's what confuses me, especially because the cloud of particles was ahead of the expanding mass of air, so shouldn't it have an even more significant hole in it?
Posted: Sun Dec 05, 2010 3:20 pm
by jackssmirkingrevenge
[youtube][/youtube]
[youtube][/youtube]
Using 57mm deck guns as an example as they don't have a muzzle brake to interfere with the blast pattern, there's no evidence of a "hole" through the cloud.
Posted: Sun Dec 05, 2010 3:32 pm
by saefroch
So the spherical cloud is the natural formation without a muzzle brake?
Posted: Sun Dec 05, 2010 3:35 pm
by jackssmirkingrevenge
saefroch wrote:So the spherical cloud is the natural formation without a muzzle brake?
Pretty much, at least in all the stills I've seen:
Posted: Sun Dec 05, 2010 3:57 pm
by saefroch
And in those stills, all the deformation is caused by the projectile's interaction with the cloud, I assume. I'll have to do another filming against something better so the muzzle's location in relationship to the cloud is apparent. I made about 2lbs of airfloat, so that should hold me for a while .
Posted: Sun Dec 05, 2010 4:19 pm
by jackssmirkingrevenge
Out of curiousity I powdered some coffee and shot it out a 6mm pneumatic, looking at it on the high speed it produced a conical pattern, perhaps the particles are too dense. Oh, and now my room has a lovely aroma
Posted: Sun Dec 05, 2010 4:24 pm
by saefroch
What did you use to grind it? Coffee also has very different properties when ground into a fine powder (espresso grind) than charcoal. I know, because I used my hand-powered burr grinder to produce the airfloat . For one, coffee generates a LOT of static potential when you grind it. So much so that it will actually increase in volume over the dry beans. Charcoal also increases in volume, but is not nearly as cohesive as a powder.
I think I might do that with some coffee, but maybe not as I might be shooting upwards of $10 out the barrel
.
