
Would this kind of design be suitable for a pneumatic? Its going to be for a 13mm ID barrel, approx muzzle velocity of 222m/s, shooting drag stabilized ammunition.
Also, how much clearance do I need between the projectile and baffle walls?
More clearance = less effective sound suppressionhow much clearance do I need between the projectile and baffle walls?
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
Nothing wrong with it as long as you have multiple baffles and a large tube.FighterAce wrote:I've been using the ported tube design for a couple of years actually and I'm not impressed by it.
The first design you posted looks more like "I have a CNC milling machine and I'm showing off" as opposed to "I've done my research on the best possible way to deflect gasses".I could easily mill out any kind of design... whatever is most effective.
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
Does it really sound like that?? I don't have a CNC but I want something as effective as possible. That picture is just one example of many...jackssmirkingrevenge wrote: The first design you posted looks more like "I have a CNC milling machine and I'm showing off" as opposed to "I've done my research on the best possible way to deflect gasses".
Actually you can... maybe not dramatically, but certainly more effective.jackssmirkingrevenge wrote: you can't really point at one being dramatically more effective that any other.
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
Hence my question...jackssmirkingrevenge wrote: Remember though that what works for firearms doesn't necessarily work for pneumatics.
Would this kind of design be suitable for a pneumatic?
Yes.auspud wrote:have any of you guy's used a muzzle brake ?
Yes......Huge reduction in recoil!if so did it reduce the recoil ????
Suppressors ARE for noise reduction. They are not muzzle brakes.does the supresser's work for noise reduction ????