Hybrid ThorJack
- jackssmirkingrevenge
- Five Star General
- Posts: 26204
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
- Has thanked: 572 times
- Been thanked: 345 times
Fantastic, can't wait to see it in action!
I got 22.34g for a tungsten carbide rod that size, given the standard density of 15.8g/cm<sup>3</sup>, maybe it has a higher carbon content.
I got 22.34g for a tungsten carbide rod that size, given the standard density of 15.8g/cm<sup>3</sup>, maybe it has a higher carbon content.
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
There's also the cobalt content to be considered when you're looking at something like what Petitlu has, which would be a carbide blank intended for being ground into a cutting tool. 15.8g/cm<sup>3</sup> is just WC, whereas one would expect the W-C-Co system to have a lower density. There is also, as you mentioned, the issue of variable W:C ratio. These things are never as simple as you'd like them to be
Spudfiles' resident expert on all things that sail through the air at improbable speeds, trailing an incandescent wake of ionized air, dissociated polymers and metal oxides.
- jackssmirkingrevenge
- Five Star General
- Posts: 26204
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
- Has thanked: 572 times
- Been thanked: 345 times
HAHAHAHAHA!
Superb! Hole punch indeed
We need more details, please tell me there's video, and you put a whole bunch of stuff behind the steel to record the spalling!
Interesting "splash" marks around the entry hole... was there target material in front of the steel?
Did the rod remain intact, have you found it at all?
Superb! Hole punch indeed
We need more details, please tell me there's video, and you put a whole bunch of stuff behind the steel to record the spalling!
Interesting "splash" marks around the entry hole... was there target material in front of the steel?
Did the rod remain intact, have you found it at all?
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
hehe!
Video coming soon!
Target: wood / profile / 2mm steel
tungsten has passed through the wood, the profile and a thickness of 2mm.
The rod is probably defragmented!
no trace ...
It was a shot at Mix30
I made a shot with the arrow also ...
Video coming soon!
Target: wood / profile / 2mm steel
tungsten has passed through the wood, the profile and a thickness of 2mm.
The rod is probably defragmented!
no trace ...
It was a shot at Mix30
I made a shot with the arrow also ...
- jackssmirkingrevenge
- Five Star General
- Posts: 26204
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
- Has thanked: 572 times
- Been thanked: 345 times
cool! you should try shooting the beam from the side, so there are two thicknesses of steel to go throughPetitlu wrote:Target: wood / profile / 2mm steel
tungsten has passed through the wood, the profile and a thickness of 2mm.
I would say it's buried somewhere... or in BelgiumThe rod is probably defragmented!
You should put enough thickness of wood (or telephone books...) to stop it twenty inches is enough: http://www.theboxotruth.com/docs/bot31_5.htm
Ooooh! did it come out intact, and fly straight?I made a shot with the arrow also ...
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
I'm sure the bulk of it is but tungsten carbide is also pretty brittle, I wouldn't be surprised if bits broke off.I would say it's buried somewhere.
From where PetitLu lives to Belgium is well over half way to where you live, I'd be worried as the mixes get higher
Edit: Oh the video is up. Much nicer recoil there too
I think we need to see a side perspective of the next shots ! And also some fruit should be included
- jackssmirkingrevenge
- Five Star General
- Posts: 26204
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
- Has thanked: 572 times
- Been thanked: 345 times
Brilliant!
In spite of the low weight the sabot and fins seems to have a made a mess of the chipboard too
That arrow definitely hit head on! I would have shot at the 2mm steel so you could make comparisons with arrow tests at plate armour, and backed it up with thick wood.
Great stuff, I agree with al-xg that we need closer video (with a suitably protected camera of course )
In spite of the low weight the sabot and fins seems to have a made a mess of the chipboard too
That arrow definitely hit head on! I would have shot at the 2mm steel so you could make comparisons with arrow tests at plate armour, and backed it up with thick wood.
Great stuff, I agree with al-xg that we need closer video (with a suitably protected camera of course )
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
"That arrow definitely hit head on! I would have shot at the 2mm steel so you could make comparisons with arrow tests at plate armour, and backed it up with thick wood. "
I wanted pierced profile!
The arrow was shattered on the floor, small little cuts.
I like the hole made of tungsten, an effect of "heat sabot"
I think for the camera, we must protect it or a big zoom
I wanted pierced profile!
The arrow was shattered on the floor, small little cuts.
I like the hole made of tungsten, an effect of "heat sabot"
I think for the camera, we must protect it or a big zoom
- jackssmirkingrevenge
- Five Star General
- Posts: 26204
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
- Has thanked: 572 times
- Been thanked: 345 times
From plain steel that was a bit optimisticPetitlu wrote:I wanted pierced profile!
hehe it does look a bit like a HEAT round hit - though if you look at kinetic hits on steel plate they look similar:I like the hole made of tungsten, an effect of "heat sabot"
A sheet of reasonably thick (5 or 10mm) polycarbonate sheet is good enough to protect from any ricochets and shrapnel.I think for the camera, we must protect it or a big zoom
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life