Bottom or side?

Building or modifying BB, Airsoft, and Pellet type of guns. Show off your custom designs, find tips and other discussion. Target practice only!
User avatar
richardbridges
Private 3
Private 3
Posts: 43
Joined: Sat Jul 15, 2006 7:46 pm
Location: GA

Donating Members

Fri Mar 30, 2007 1:07 pm

Wouldn't it be more effective to have the air flow in from the side than the bottom?
Attachments
blocks.jpg
blocks.jpg (21.66 KiB) Viewed 4874 times
User avatar
joannaardway
Corporal 5
Corporal 5
Posts: 949
Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2006 4:57 pm
Location: SW Hertfordshire, England, UK.

Fri Mar 30, 2007 2:06 pm

It's much debated.

It would be nice to see someone actually build two otherwise identical vortex guns and prove it one way or the other.
Novacastrian: How about use whatever the heck you can get your hands on?
frankrede: Well then I guess it won't matter when you decide to drink bleach because your out of kool-aid.
...I'm sorry, but that made my year.
User avatar
subterranean
Specialist
Specialist
Posts: 171
Joined: Sat Oct 21, 2006 11:39 am
Location: columbus, ohio

Fri Mar 30, 2007 2:48 pm

"noname" should be here shortly to clear things up. Acording to him the shorter the ditance the bb has to travel will allow for maximum speed to be kept.
User avatar
noname
First Sergeant 4
First Sergeant 4
Posts: 2698
Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2006 9:19 pm
Location: Bay Area, CA

Fri Mar 30, 2007 6:06 pm

Yep. How'd you guess? :D
Besides, it wouldn't work at all with "my style" of block, without the full circle.
User avatar
Mr.Russ
Specialist 4
Specialist 4
Posts: 429
Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 9:07 pm

Fri Mar 30, 2007 6:35 pm

it probably would work, like noname said - with a full vortex circle.

Butttt it seems to be alot easier to get the air source from the bottom.
User avatar
richardbridges
Private 3
Private 3
Posts: 43
Joined: Sat Jul 15, 2006 7:46 pm
Location: GA

Donating Members

Sat Mar 31, 2007 1:25 pm

I'm not going for easy. I just got a 1/2 inch x 2 inch x 4 foot T6 aluminum bar and a Hudson 800 psi spray gun. Both free!
User avatar
noname
First Sergeant 4
First Sergeant 4
Posts: 2698
Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2006 9:19 pm
Location: Bay Area, CA

Sat Mar 31, 2007 1:48 pm

Damn, I wish I was you. The normal air source works better, and it's easier. If you're not going for easy, you're going for worse performance. Just make a normal inline block.
User avatar
zeigs spud
Corporal 2
Corporal 2
Posts: 657
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 10:39 pm

Sat Mar 31, 2007 2:15 pm

subterranean wrote:"noname" should be here shortly to clear things up. Acording to him the shorter the ditance the bb has to travel will allow for maximum speed to be kept.
yea thats pretty much true, the less friction & shorter they have to travel the less energy they lose.
User avatar
richardbridges
Private 3
Private 3
Posts: 43
Joined: Sat Jul 15, 2006 7:46 pm
Location: GA

Donating Members

Sun Apr 01, 2007 7:04 pm

What about completely eliminating the vortex so that the bbs have no surface to go around? Stick a magnet in the bottom to hold them in place in the barrel at the bottom of the feed.
Attachments
no block_thumb.gif
no block_thumb.gif (5.3 KiB) Viewed 4736 times
User avatar
lukemc
Corporal
Corporal
Posts: 565
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 8:48 am
Location: NY

Sun Apr 01, 2007 7:09 pm

for one thing it is very hard to create a hopper that constantly feeds without jamming and also it is gravity feed so you would have to keep it up the whole time
"Those who are different change the world. Those who are the same keep it that way"
User avatar
noname
First Sergeant 4
First Sergeant 4
Posts: 2698
Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2006 9:19 pm
Location: Bay Area, CA

Sun Apr 01, 2007 7:37 pm

It's been done, and works so much worse than a vortex, it's unbelievable. You have to shake it to get it to feed, and then the ROF is like 5 per second, it sucks.
User avatar
jackssmirkingrevenge
Five Star General
Five Star General
Posts: 26189
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
Has thanked: 551 times
Been thanked: 328 times

Donating Members

Mon Apr 02, 2007 12:11 am

hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
User avatar
Modderxtrordanare
Corporal 2
Corporal 2
Posts: 686
Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2006 1:22 pm
Location: Texas

Donating Members

Mon Apr 02, 2007 1:28 am

That thread you linked to is about inlet placement on a cloud, where as richardbridges is asking about a vortex.

I would think that placing the inlet perpendicular to the barrel would be more effective [theoretically] due to less surface it must travel over.
User avatar
jackssmirkingrevenge
Five Star General
Five Star General
Posts: 26189
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
Has thanked: 551 times
Been thanked: 328 times

Donating Members

Mon Apr 02, 2007 5:29 am

Modderxtrordanare wrote:That thread you linked to is about inlet placement on a cloud, where as richardbridges is asking about a vortex.
My point is that you're feeding air into what is effectively an expansion chamber at a lower rate than it's being expelled from the barrel - this remains true irrespective of what angle you're feeding the air, so simply varying the latter variable isn't really going to have any significant effect on performance.
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
User avatar
richardbridges
Private 3
Private 3
Posts: 43
Joined: Sat Jul 15, 2006 7:46 pm
Location: GA

Donating Members

Tue Apr 03, 2007 5:41 pm

Thank you jackssmirkingrevenge. You cleared that up for me.
Post Reply