since it worked well it seems I give good advices, don't I ? heh

there won't be any performace increase to be honestI wonder what the performance increase would be if you used .177 pellets
Yup, epoxy to epoxy, dust to dustsharpshooter11000 wrote:I'm guessing the metal parts are epoxied in and you didn't machine threads in the CF?
Yup, for a given system, bigger bore and heavier projectile will give more muzzle energy.there won't be any performace increase to be honest
heavier ammo equalls more efficient system - that's due to the speed of sound
Time for one of my favourite quotes te be dug upso .22 cal version is more efficient than .177 cal - at least as far as energy put in by muzzle energy achieved is concerned - it could be different if you focus on penetration, which jsr has found to be better for .177 cal than .22 (IIRC)
A 68 pounder smoothbore and a 7 inch Armstrong gun firing 200 lb shot had been fired at 4.5 inch plate backed by 18 inches of teak. The 68 pounders had penetrated the target, while the 200 pounder had made hardly any impression on it. Noble showed that the answer lay in the relative velocity of the two projectiles. The 68 pounder had been moving at 1,425 feet per second when it struck, while the 200 pounder was loafing along at a mere 780 feet per second. On the face of it, the 200 pounder with 156,000 foot-pounds of energy should have out performed the 68 pounder with 96,900, but the low velocity of the heavier projectile allowed the plate to deform and resist the blow, whereas the higher velocity of the 68 lb shot tore through the plate before it could begin to absorb the blow.
As Noble said in his paper, "What is wanted is velocity; if you sacrifice it to weight you will only be able to keep knocking at the door without entering."
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
It's not pressure rated, but given the 1:10 ratio of wall thickness to inner diameter, and small bore, I'm happy to take it to "normal" 300-400 psi pengun pressures.sagthegreat wrote:how many psi can this tubing handle?
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
You misunderstood, I make you want to invest in machine toolsGun Freak wrote:You make me want to give up, Jack.
The military have no use for pen guns, and if they did, they would probably use powder burning ones...lets make some pen guns that look like pens and go to 1000 psi, and sell them to the military
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
A cane gun would definitely have much more power due to the bigger volume and barrel length.jakethebeast wrote:How about upping pen gun with steroids and then put it to a cane?Shouldn't be too hard...
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
The military have no use for pen guns, and if they did, they would probably use powder burning ones...[/quote]lets make some pen guns that look like pens and go to 1000 psi, and sell them to the military
If you have magical substances then you don't need much powersagthegreat wrote:Spys would have a use, and not to mention the types of substance that can be put on hollow tip pellets to make them "magical"
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
You can make a request heresagthegreat wrote:I want that firing cap thing up have. But I don't have a lathe...
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life