i dont understand the "revised" version i dont see a chamber
and all the c:b test you are using are not too much good for a pneumatic, those test are for a cumbustion, and those test gave the most efficency. for a pneumatic basicly the bigger chamber the better. but as you get above about 2:1 ratio the extra power is often not noticalbe
First post and first gun- 6mm SML (Small Munitions Launcher)
No worries, Techie.
c11man, thanks for pointing out that the tests were done with a combustion cannon, i didn't notice that. Thanks also for the chamber info. As for the revised version, the chamber was the "stock" of the gun since i thought the chamber had to be that small.
I've redesigned... once again... because I was making it way more complex than it had to be. I threw out the idea of making a piston valve, started from scratch, and this is what I came up with. Thanks to c11man's info on the bigger the chamber, the better for pneumatics, I'll have to make a bigger chamber.
Let me know what you think, and remember, that isn't the final chamber.
c11man, thanks for pointing out that the tests were done with a combustion cannon, i didn't notice that. Thanks also for the chamber info. As for the revised version, the chamber was the "stock" of the gun since i thought the chamber had to be that small.
I've redesigned... once again... because I was making it way more complex than it had to be. I threw out the idea of making a piston valve, started from scratch, and this is what I came up with. Thanks to c11man's info on the bigger the chamber, the better for pneumatics, I'll have to make a bigger chamber.
Let me know what you think, and remember, that isn't the final chamber.
- jackssmirkingrevenge
- Five Star General
- Posts: 26183
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
- Has thanked: 547 times
- Been thanked: 326 times
That's more like it, get yourself a shock pump and at 400 psi it should be pretty impressive for its size.
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
- POLAND_SPUD
- Captain
- Posts: 5402
- Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 4:43 pm
- Been thanked: 1 time
yeah c11man is right, it's for combustionsBurnt Latke's Chamber to Barrel Ratio Tests
also he is right that you might have used a larger chamber... your first chamber was too large but this one could be slightly larger... you should be fine with a 3" length of 1/2" pipe... esspecially if you want to use a longer barrel
of course it's completely up to you and the source of air that you have
I have to admit that in the past I was a big fan of c:b ratios smaller than 1:1... normally they were lower than 0.5:1
but now that I have a fridge compressor with a tank I don't mind using ratios close to 2:1 especially on a small bore launchers that don't use much air anyway
Children are the future
unless we stop them now
unless we stop them now
- jackssmirkingrevenge
- Five Star General
- Posts: 26183
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
- Has thanked: 547 times
- Been thanked: 326 times
Excellent, shouldn't be hard to find a good one for not much $$$. You might want to move to a longer barrel in future too, it will make a considerable difference in power.julktyl wrote:Trying to find one for decent price, will be pretty much just like the beto shock pump you bought. 400 psi here I come!
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
POLAND_SPUD, I'll see if i can find something along those lines for a chamber.
jsr, brake line is very easy to customize lengths. Sometime in the future I might do some tests similar to Burnt Latke's to figure out the optimal c:b ratio for airsoft BBs.
jsr, brake line is very easy to customize lengths. Sometime in the future I might do some tests similar to Burnt Latke's to figure out the optimal c:b ratio for airsoft BBs.
- jackssmirkingrevenge
- Five Star General
- Posts: 26183
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
- Has thanked: 547 times
- Been thanked: 326 times
Or you could download GGDT
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
that's EXACTLY what i was thinking it could be made. due to my stupid lack of parts(pretty sad as its just a few connectors) i couldn't build it.I've redesigned... once again... because I was making it way more complex than it had to be. I threw out the idea of making a piston valve, started from scratch, and this is what I came up with. Thanks to c11man's info on the bigger the chamber, the better for pneumatics, I'll have to make a bigger chamber.