Flamethrower!

A place for general potato gun questions and discussions.
OwThatsMyEye
Private 4
Private 4
Posts: 74
Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 2:27 pm

Sat Oct 28, 2006 8:02 am

SpudStuff wrote:
he'll probably die.
Many have been built all have lived...

Please justify yourself. Sure it is quite dangerous but not id the saftey percautions are taken.
Yeah, and really whats the point in making somthing that isn't dangerous. That just takes all the fun out of it.
User avatar
Spyider
Specialist
Specialist
Posts: 122
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 11:18 pm
Location: Wisconsin
Contact:

Sat Oct 28, 2006 10:20 am

well thats 1/2 the fun in it isnt it and the other 1/2 is to show it off to your frinds... or on this site lolz :lol:
User avatar
frankrede
Sergeant Major 2
Sergeant Major 2
Posts: 3220
Joined: Thu Jul 20, 2006 9:47 pm
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 1 time

Sat Oct 28, 2006 12:33 pm

I wouldn't use napalm.
It seems alot more dangerous.
Current project: Afghanistan deployment
User avatar
Hotwired
First Sergeant 3
First Sergeant 3
Posts: 2599
Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2006 5:51 am
Location: UK

Sat Oct 28, 2006 4:18 pm

A UK made 'external combustion cannon' using petrol and 20 bar co2.

http://www.uksgc.co.uk/forums/index.php ... c=175&st=0
User avatar
sgort87
Corporal 5
Corporal 5
Posts: 994
Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2005 10:32 am
Location: Lockport, Illinois

Donating Members

Mon Oct 30, 2006 9:06 am

Napalm is one of the most harmless "dangerous" things ever. It's basically sterno. It's a flammable goo. It's hard to light and really isn't all that impressive. It doesn't explode like many people assume.

It's only good if you plan on splashing it on someone once it's lit. The stuff stays in a hard but flexible state until lit and then it gets all gooey and stucks to whatever touches it.
Post Reply