Nuclear Cannon (literally)
- Jumpin Jehosaphat
- Specialist
- Posts: 188
- Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2007 8:20 pm
This is my favorite picture (and cannon) of all time.
The explosion seen was a 280mm nuclear shell with a yield of 15 Kilotons.
The shot was conducted during Operation Upshot Knothole at a test site in Nevada on May 25, 1953.
The explosion seen was a 280mm nuclear shell with a yield of 15 Kilotons.
The shot was conducted during Operation Upshot Knothole at a test site in Nevada on May 25, 1953.
- Attachments
-
- I like this picture so much I made it into a signature.
- Atomic Cannon Sig.jpg (38.68 KiB) Viewed 3359 times
- super spuder
- Corporal
- Posts: 558
- Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2007 9:05 pm
- Location: Ontario Canada
hmmm... this is the coolest spam ever lol jk... cool pics
trying to decide on a new project, probably something small.
- paaiyan
- First Sergeant
- Posts: 2140
- Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 10:03 pm
- Location: Central Oklahoma
- Been thanked: 1 time
Well that was probably atomic Annie. I'm not really sure if this would fall under the exploding projectiles category or not. You guys tell me.
"Who ever said the pen was mightier than the sword, obviously, never encountered automatic weapons."
-General Douglass MacArthur
Read my dog's blog - Life of Kilo
-General Douglass MacArthur
Read my dog's blog - Life of Kilo
- super spuder
- Corporal
- Posts: 558
- Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2007 9:05 pm
- Location: Ontario Canada
put them up i wana see
trying to decide on a new project, probably something small.
- Jumpin Jehosaphat
- Specialist
- Posts: 188
- Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2007 8:20 pm
Not trying to spam. I figured it's cannon related, and people here would appreciate it. I would like to see the video too.
Edit: Mr. Crowley, are we allowed to have picture signatures here? It seems like very few people do it, and if it's generally considered irritating I could disable it.
Edit: Mr. Crowley, are we allowed to have picture signatures here? It seems like very few people do it, and if it's generally considered irritating I could disable it.
Ive seen the vid. Pretty crazy with the damage. After shock is amazing.
http://www.ebaumsworld.com/video/watch/454/
Pretty sure thats it.
EDIT: Yep thats it. Being capped is crap.
http://www.ebaumsworld.com/video/watch/454/
Pretty sure thats it.
EDIT: Yep thats it. Being capped is crap.
- Jumpin Jehosaphat
- Specialist
- Posts: 188
- Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2007 8:20 pm
My sig was a little too big, so I resized it.
but wouldn't the tape have been destroyed? it just seems very unlikely that a video camera would survive a nuclear blast. i mean even video cameras of our time don't survive a flash powder explosion... just seems very unlikely for them cameras to survive...
-
- Private 4
- Posts: 64
- Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2007 4:58 am
- Location: Christchurch New Zealand
the EMP would fry them even if they survived physically.
at the very least it would wipe the footage!!!
they probably had the ones 7 miles away heavily shielded.
and yes this would fall under exploding projectiles i would say but i dont mind if it stays!!
at the very least it would wipe the footage!!!
they probably had the ones 7 miles away heavily shielded.
and yes this would fall under exploding projectiles i would say but i dont mind if it stays!!
Davey Crockett they called it they didn't use it because its range was 12 miles and the fallout range was 13 miles that doesn't work http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Davy_Crock ... ar_device)
Who cares, it's not like one of us could duplicate one of those anyway...paaiyan wrote:Well that was probably atomic Annie. I'm not really sure if this would fall under the exploding projectiles category or not. You guys tell me.
Forever dreaming...