Sound barrier
How many of you have sent something supersonic out of a pneumatic spudgun using only compressed AIR? If you think its not possible, or if you do... I want to hear your opinons.
"i wonder if i can do that a little lowe- oh apparently no"
"If a little is good.....more is better"
My last words: "Ooooo! what does that do!?!?"
"If a little is good.....more is better"
My last words: "Ooooo! what does that do!?!?"
- Brian the brain
- Moderator
- Posts: 3496
- Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2005 2:06 am
- Location: Holland
- Been thanked: 3 times
Can't be too many people.
I've heard of two claims, I believe.
There have been numerous discussions about this, and therefor I don't think you'll get a lot of response.
It gets kinda old...and discussing the subject some more doesn't really get us anywhere.
build one, and you will get a lot of response....not now...
I've heard of two claims, I believe.
There have been numerous discussions about this, and therefor I don't think you'll get a lot of response.
It gets kinda old...and discussing the subject some more doesn't really get us anywhere.
build one, and you will get a lot of response....not now...
It's entirely possible - it has been done (As rp181 has linked, the Airforce Condor rifle manages it), and the effect can be explained, mostly by shock heating.
However, it's a real challenge, requiring favourable conditions, so I personally automatically question it. I know GGDT gives supersonic results reasonably easily, but it's not that easy in real life.
However, it's a real challenge, requiring favourable conditions, so I personally automatically question it. I know GGDT gives supersonic results reasonably easily, but it's not that easy in real life.
Does that thing kinda look like a big cat to you?
i am currently working on a (hopefully) supersonic spudgun. It has a 10' long tennis ball barrel (2.5") and two 4"x 5' air tanks, the valve is a SGTC supah+ valve (this is my 1st gun, so i didnt want to build my own piston), and the SGTC muzzel velocity calculator estimated it at 1400 fps with a tennis ball (tanks at 120 psi)
thanks for all the info
thanks for all the info
"i wonder if i can do that a little lowe- oh apparently no"
"If a little is good.....more is better"
My last words: "Ooooo! what does that do!?!?"
"If a little is good.....more is better"
My last words: "Ooooo! what does that do!?!?"
- Brian the brain
- Moderator
- Posts: 3496
- Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2005 2:06 am
- Location: Holland
- Been thanked: 3 times
Look up S.W.A.T. cannon and watch your hopes fade...
Only shock heating will do it, that or swithing to helium, but that wasn't your question.
Only shock heating will do it, that or swithing to helium, but that wasn't your question.
thanks...I cant wait till the weather warms up (im in ohio) so I can shoot it
"i wonder if i can do that a little lowe- oh apparently no"
"If a little is good.....more is better"
My last words: "Ooooo! what does that do!?!?"
"If a little is good.....more is better"
My last words: "Ooooo! what does that do!?!?"
- MrCrowley
- Moderator
- Posts: 10078
- Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 10:42 pm
- Location: Auckland, New Zealand
- Been thanked: 3 times
I got closer to 800ft/s with GGDT.Tidbit77 wrote:i am currently working on a (hopefully) supersonic spudgun. It has a 10' long tennis ball barrel (2.5") and two 4"x 5' air tanks, the valve is a SGTC supah+ valve (this is my 1st gun, so i didnt want to build my own piston), and the SGTC muzzel velocity calculator estimated it at 1400 fps with a tennis ball (tanks at 120 psi)
thanks for all the info
I don't see a tennis ball going supersonic with only 1 x 2.5" piston valve and 120psi. I'd imagine it'd be quite a challenge to send a tennis ball the speed of sound using air and a barrel only 10' long.
BTW, I don't think the second 4"x5' tank is required. Just one will give similar performance and save you a lot of hassle with filling it with compressed air.
i agree with mr c it would have to be at 270 psi that would take along time to pump up but it is possibole at the right psi
recomendation tie a bag to the front of the barrel then vaccum the barrel out so no air is in there
recomendation tie a bag to the front of the barrel then vaccum the barrel out so no air is in there
- MrCrowley
- Moderator
- Posts: 10078
- Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 10:42 pm
- Location: Auckland, New Zealand
- Been thanked: 3 times
270psi still falls short, just. I was very generous with my parameter variables too. BTW, if you have just the one chamber, you lose about 15ft/s. I really don't think it's worth it, unless you have a 20ft barrel.
Even if you did get it to 270psi like twizi said, you wouldn't be able to use PVC or Joel's Piston Valve. Even if it was all made of steel, I have my doubts it'd break the sound barrier at that pressure.
Even if you did get it to 270psi like twizi said, you wouldn't be able to use PVC or Joel's Piston Valve. Even if it was all made of steel, I have my doubts it'd break the sound barrier at that pressure.
- Brian the brain
- Moderator
- Posts: 3496
- Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2005 2:06 am
- Location: Holland
- Been thanked: 3 times
Slower than a tennis ball.
More mass compared to the surface area.
Lots more.
Forget going supersonic with a pvc aircannon.
Subsonic velocities can do a lot of damage anyways...
More mass compared to the surface area.
Lots more.
Forget going supersonic with a pvc aircannon.
Subsonic velocities can do a lot of damage anyways...