Navy Railgun....

Meaningful discussion outside of the potato gun realm. Projects, theories, current events. Non-productive discussion will be locked.
User avatar
Technician1002
Captain
Captain
Posts: 5189
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 11:10 am

Fri Sep 16, 2011 12:55 pm

One noise source not to overlook is the motion of the high current components. Due to the magnetic fields involved, they do move in spite of heavy construction to limit their movement. In reality any high current conductor is a speaker.

Here is an example. Some wires are subject to a high current test. This is not nearly as high of a current in a rail gun. There are several noises in this shot. One is the breaker closing, the next is the wires responding to the magnetic fields generated, next is the arc as one of the whipped wires parts company, and last is the response of a car alarm to this silent test.
[youtube][/youtube]
User avatar
jackssmirkingrevenge
Five Star General
Five Star General
Posts: 26203
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
Has thanked: 569 times
Been thanked: 344 times

Donating Members

Tue Feb 28, 2012 3:25 pm

[youtube][/youtube]

Flipping heck.
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
User avatar
sharpshooter11000
Specialist 2
Specialist 2
Posts: 247
Joined: Sat Aug 06, 2011 1:34 pm
Location: UK

Tue Feb 28, 2012 5:00 pm

Is there a reason they use that shape of projectile? It doesn't seem to be very stable in flight.
User avatar
killerbanjo
Specialist 2
Specialist 2
Posts: 245
Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2010 6:56 pm

Tue Feb 28, 2012 5:16 pm

I think with rail guns its more towards the efficiency of it accelerating in the gun. Using other shapes would make it much less efficient energy wise
User avatar
Fnord
First Sergeant 2
First Sergeant 2
Posts: 2239
Joined: Tue Feb 13, 2007 9:20 pm
Location: Pripyat
Been thanked: 1 time
Contact:

Tue Feb 28, 2012 7:10 pm

Might be a mock-up of what the sabot will be shaped like, just not designed to separate. It would make sense from an analytical point of view. A sabot failure could potentially ruin the gun, so for initial testing you would want to eliminate that variable.

Edit;
"The rounds we are firing currently are non-aerodynamic slugs," Ellis said of the testing. "They match the interior ballistics of what the launcher is expected to see but are intended to slow down quickly."
...From the news article.
Guess they weren't actually shooting anything with it yet. They probably wanted to examine the projectile afterwards.
Image
User avatar
jackssmirkingrevenge
Five Star General
Five Star General
Posts: 26203
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
Has thanked: 569 times
Been thanked: 344 times

Donating Members

Wed Feb 29, 2012 4:43 am

Fnord wrote:Might be a mock-up of what the sabot will be shaped like, just not designed to separate. It would make sense from an analytical point of view. A sabot failure could potentially ruin the gun, so for initial testing you would want to eliminate that variable.
Pretty much. Check out the sabot for this General Atomics mini-A4 style projectile: http://www.military.com/video/guns/nava ... 431955001/

Image

Image
The sabot round went seven kilometers downrange after punching through a 1/8-inch thick steel plate
Bloody hell...
Guess they weren't actually shooting anything with it yet. They probably wanted to examine the projectile afterwards.
... or avoid accidentally hitting France :D
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
User avatar
CpTn_lAw
Corporal 5
Corporal 5
Posts: 987
Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2005 9:10 am
Location: France

Wed Feb 29, 2012 7:14 am

Yes , yes please avoid hitting france!!!
"J'mets mes pieds où j'veux, et c'est souvent dans la gueule."
Post Reply