Potatoes last one shot, so build reusable! Discuss ammo designs and ideas. Tough to find cannon part or questions? Ask here!
-
dewey-1
- Sergeant 3
- Posts: 1298
- Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2007 10:24 am
- Location: NE Wisconsin USA
Sun Oct 02, 2011 7:53 am
MrCrowley wrote:Since I don't have long between finishing university for the semester and the estimated launch date, I've been thinking about every minor detail of the launch to insure I account for it.
A very important/critical detail for a successful test firing that you have not shown or mentioned yet is where the MiniBoys center of gravity is.
Load it up with your talcum powder/chalk and then determine the balancing point. Measure that point to the nose tip.
32 mm or less would be optimal!
-
Moonbogg
- Staff Sergeant 3
- Posts: 1734
- Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2008 10:20 pm
- Location: SoCal
- Has thanked: 163 times
- Been thanked: 100 times
Sun Oct 02, 2011 2:36 pm
Just thought i'd mention, if the projectile lands in the sand it will get lost for sure. I was sitting in a beach chair (at the beach) and simply dropped my wedding ring right next to me. Figured i'd just lean down and pick it up, and I did, but it took about 20 minutes to find the friggin thing.
Will you be able to chrony the projectile?
-
Mr.Tallahassee
- Specialist 3
- Posts: 364
- Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2011 2:35 am
Sun Oct 02, 2011 3:09 pm
You could go buy a cheap knock off metal detector for 50 or so US dollars. I had one capable of finding a spoon about 2 feet deep. Miniboy could probably be found up to 3 or so feet deep. At that shallow of an angle It shouldn't go very deep at all.
-
jackssmirkingrevenge
- Five Star General
- Posts: 26203
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
- Has thanked: 569 times
- Been thanked: 345 times
Sun Oct 02, 2011 3:16 pm
Mr.Tallahassee wrote:At that shallow of an angle It shouldn't go very deep at all.
I bet it would go pretty deep. Think of the penetration depth of its namesake
You'd probably go insane from all the other metal items on a beach before you find it though.
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
-
cammyd32
- Specialist 3
- Posts: 326
- Joined: Fri Apr 29, 2011 7:00 am
Sun Oct 02, 2011 3:23 pm
Or you could dish out a lot of money for a metal detector with a radar style screen, one of those would find anything.
and yes they do exist, a family friend has one and when I was small I used to go around on the beach digging up bits of washed up ship.
-
ramses
- Staff Sergeant 2
- Posts: 1679
- Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 6:50 pm
Sun Oct 02, 2011 4:18 pm
I will point out that the optimal angle is more like 45-40 degrees. More like 45 because of the low Cd.
POLAND_SPUD wrote:even if there was no link I'd know it's a bot because of female name
-
jackssmirkingrevenge
- Five Star General
- Posts: 26203
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
- Has thanked: 569 times
- Been thanked: 345 times
Sun Oct 02, 2011 4:32 pm
ramses wrote:I will point out that the optimal angle is more like 45-40 degrees. More like 45 because of the low Cd.
45 degrees in a vacuum.
In the real world however, spin stabilised projectiles tend to achieve maximum range below that angle, while finned projectiles go above it.
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
-
Fnord
- First Sergeant 2
- Posts: 2239
- Joined: Tue Feb 13, 2007 9:20 pm
- Location: Pripyat
- Been thanked: 1 time
-
Contact:
Sun Oct 02, 2011 6:14 pm
I think there is a more elegant solution to projectile recovery.
-
Attachments
-
- CIMG0882c.jpg (34.17 KiB) Viewed 2402 times
-
ramses
- Staff Sergeant 2
- Posts: 1679
- Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 6:50 pm
Sun Oct 02, 2011 7:33 pm
jackssmirkingrevenge wrote:ramses wrote:I will point out that the optimal angle is more like 45-40 degrees. More like 45 because of the low Cd.
45 degrees in a vacuum.
In the real world however, spin stabilised projectiles tend to achieve maximum range below that angle, while finned projectiles go above it.
I agree. The angles I used were from horisontal. Obviously, its less than 45 (more horisontal). I think your referece measured from the vertical for some reason.
As a sidenote, my friend's dad is a super arrogant engineer. He refuses to accept that 45 degrees is only optimal in vacuume (he thinks it applies in atmosphere as well). He also has mentally replaced F=A*P with F=P/A in his head. Any suggestions on how to break through with him? I've tried dimensional analysis for F=AP, but it's not working
Also, he keeps arguing that analog computers are superior to digital ones. And that wankel engines are more efficient than piston engines.
[/rant]
POLAND_SPUD wrote:even if there was no link I'd know it's a bot because of female name
-
saefroch
- Staff Sergeant 2
- Posts: 1679
- Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2009 8:47 am
- Location: U.S.A.- See Map
Sun Oct 02, 2011 8:11 pm
He may have a point with Wankel engines, but they're an engineering nightmare. I say just use hydrogen fuel cells, efficiency blows away combustion engines.
If he's that convinced... I fear there is no hope.
-
DYI
- First Sergeant 5
- Posts: 2862
- Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2007 8:18 pm
- Location: Here and there
Sun Oct 02, 2011 8:18 pm
Jack's reference measured from the horizontal. An M892A2 round has a high enough muzzle speed and low enough drag that it goes high enough for the reduced air density to make a difference. A similarly extreme example of the effect can be seen in the Paris Gun of WW1.
Your friend's dad is not an engineer if he's incapable of such basic dimensional analysis, or the intuitive understanding of low-altitude trajectories. I suggest euthanasia.
Spudfiles' resident expert on all things that sail through the air at improbable speeds, trailing an incandescent wake of ionized air, dissociated polymers and metal oxides.
-
MrCrowley
- Moderator
- Posts: 10078
- Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 10:42 pm
- Location: Auckland, New Zealand
- Been thanked: 3 times
Sun Oct 02, 2011 9:30 pm
Fnord wrote:I think there is a more elegant solution to projectile recovery.
Haha I like it
Similar ideas had been discussed but we never got as far as writing on a .jpg image
On another note, what about making a solenoid inside the projectile and trying to pick up the location via interference? Considering the solenoid would be quite small, inside a metal casing and buried several feet under sand I highly doubt this idea is even remotely feasible .
-
Gippeto
- First Sergeant 3
- Posts: 2504
- Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 10:14 am
- Location: Soon to be socialist shit hole.
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 17 times
Sun Oct 02, 2011 10:38 pm
ramses wrote:As a sidenote, my friend's dad is a super arrogant engineer. ]
What KIND of engineer? Sanitation engineer perhaps?
"It could be that the purpose of your life is to serve as a warning to others" – unknown
Liberalism is a mental disorder, reality is it's cure.