... couldn't find the related statistics :-/al-xg wrote:http://patator.frbb.net/t9874p420-blabla-libre#255834 pretty interesting results
Indeed, and the arming switch is a nice touch!Ah nice clear schematic dewey-1 !
I would say the opposite, it's rigidly supported by the nature of the structure and therefore is less likely to deform and absorb the blow.I reckon the steel post PetitLu is shooting at is harder to penetrate than a flat plate of the same metal and thickness.
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
What do you mean by jacketed?Petitlu wrote:In fact, as I now do not load the gun through the mouth, I can not fire bullets jacketed?
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
I agree that a supported target dissipates less energy, but in this particular case looking at the relative size of the projectile vs the width of the rectangular tube, I'm not so sure. If it were just a bit wider I'd definitely agree.I would say the opposite,
I think at least a one off sabot+tungsten dart shot is in order ! I agree that a supported target dissipates less energy, but in this particular case looking at the relative size of the projectile vs the width of the rectangular tube, I'm not so sure. If it were just a bit wider I'd definitely agree.
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
