I see your point, however... could you not shield the electronics/ engine with a thin piece of sheet metal? Leaving the propeller and foam body to be disposable?In my mind, I seek only to "mark" my opponent, not "destroy"
Spaderman17 wrote:In my mind, I seek only to "mark" my opponent, not "destroy"
Fair point...Even if we use the Chinese electronics, my friends will want to play with me! :sad3: :sad3: :sad2:
Your user name should have been an indication of courseI am fascinated by Warbirds, and they did not "Braaaaaaapp" But "Ratata Ratata
My idea of aerial combat, ammunition is limited, and the "windows shot" are carefully chosen beings.
Of course, the aircraft used for this type of combat, are quite slow.
I think the damage would come from hitting the ground as opposed to the actual BBs... maybe a parachute system?CS wrote:I see your point, however... could you not shield the electronics/ engine with a thin piece of sheet metal? Leaving the propeller and foam body to be disposable?
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
When I was 20 and I did my military service, I would not have missed a single episode of Papy Boyington! and 35 years later, I am still a fan .....CS,
As a lot of kids are, I was, and am, interested in the theatrics of war. I had a vivid fantasy of full fledged rc combat
Not boring, just more technical and realisticjackssmirkingrevenge wrote: Booooooooooooooo!!!!
Boring!
Not exactly! my user name comes from "Simply Plastic Airplanes Design" and my fighter is built on the basis of http://www.spadtothebone.net/ Fighter in CoroplastYour user name should have been an indication of course
Indeed, I was being facetiousSpaderman17 wrote:Not boring, just more technical and realistic
A happy coincidence then heheheNot exactly! my user name comes from "Simply Plastic Airplanes Design" and my fighter is built on the basis of http://www.spadtothebone.net/ Fighter in Coroplast
Great, I think it would be worth incorporating into your next prototype. You can make a gun that is technically interesting as well as efficient and lightweightThanks you for drawing balanced valve ! I understood
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
Sometimes it's better to spend time thinking about a simple solution than making a complicated one.Spaderman17 wrote:I always thought of a "rotary", but I like your animated concept and I may experience your concept ....
You are right, the simplicity and probably a good solution!
Spaderman17 wrote:Unfortunately, even if I start with a simple concept, on arrival, I always complicated! this is stronger than me! :dontknow:
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
"Don't Panic" BB
The small spring next to the air input needs to be finely tuned in order to counterbalance the pressure. Too little force and it will leak, too much force and it will need too much hammer strength to open.hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
