So I have a few short questions... the first is, does this still count as a double post if it is completely unrelated?
Ok ok, the real first question is that I have been thinking about ways I would make my piston hybrid breech-loaded. One way I thought might work is to take a fat high pressure/durameter-whatever O-ring and make a sort of system like this:

The sleeve would probably just be some Sch 80 PVC. Do you think this will work or will it not hold up to the pressure?(Obviously the sleeve/pvc wont be holding ANY pressure...

) I would be going to 20x at the very most.
My second (also real) question is, up until now I have been planning on using a Sch 10 Stainless Steel 316L pipe as the barrel, with an ID of 1.682". (Golfballs have an OD of 1.68"!!! 500th of a millimeter off!!) The barrel's rated Working PSI is 2160 psi, and ultimate burst pressure is 8605 psi.
Using HGDT, I calculated that the barrel should have been able to handle 20x fine as the barrel would only be handling around 2500 psi. But then I toyed around with the burst diaphragm rupturing pressure (Using a piston hybrid but I don't think HGDT has an option for piston valves..) and if I fine tuned it right, the barrel pressure went all the way up to 5000 psi!!! I know that you can adjust when a piston valve moves back at a certain pressure, but it might take a milisecond before it really starts moving back! Either way, it is way too risky for a handheld... I was OK with the barrel pressure being just 400 psi higher than the working pressure since it's steel, but this is way too insanely, crazily, dangerously close to the pipe's ultimate burst pressure.
You probably would first think that the solution is to increase the Schedule, or wall thickness. But when the wall thickness increases, the ID decreases, not the OD. So even if you shave the ID to make it bigger, you still end up with the same wall thickness in the end!!
Does anyone have a solution to this problem? Are there any stainless steel pipes that increase in OD with wall thickness?
EDIT: I found a solution, pipe is measured/labelled by it's OD, and Tube is rated by it's ID. So I will use tube for the barrel.
The THIRD question is, I have been virtually assembling the cannon on a Google Spreadsheet (
Here it is), tracking the price, weight, info, etc. For the piston, I was wondering if I needed to have the reducer (houses the unbalanced spool valve) at the end of the small nipple (that holds the pilot volume) at Sch 80 as well? It will be behind the piston, so unless the piston leaks, the only pressure it will deal with will be the pilot volume pressure. Maybe downsizing to a class 1000 fitting? Let me know what you think.
Thank you for your time.