I made a prototype to test the viability of a 3mm HPA launcher for my sentry gun project, basically a tube fed detent type launcher. Sadly the rate of fire is far higher than I expected, in spite of the tight detent, I guess it's a result of tube as opposed to cloud type feeding, which puts the BBs directly into the breech.
Similar behaviour can be observed in this design along the same lines though without a detent.
Here it is in action at 420 fps, the first video is a 25 round burst which as you can see happens in very little time, followed by some single shots.
[youtube][/youtube]
3mm HPA protoype w/detent seal
- jackssmirkingrevenge
- Five Star General
- Posts: 26203
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
- Has thanked: 569 times
- Been thanked: 345 times
Last edited by jackssmirkingrevenge on Fri Nov 02, 2018 5:47 am, edited 1 time in total.
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
- jackssmirkingrevenge
- Five Star General
- Posts: 26203
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
- Has thanked: 569 times
- Been thanked: 345 times
The tube feed allows a BB to get into the breech with very little flow, but the problem with this style of detent is that it stops the BB assymetrically which skews it under pressure and allows it to leak, so I can't restrict air flow too much because the air will start leaking past the BB at a higher rate that what is coming from the source and pop-off pressure will never be reached.
I suppose my best bet (without going through the complication of making a dual detent) is to have a washer/o-ring-in-a-compression-fitting style detent that will support the BB uniformly.
edit: in line with the above paragraph, plan B:
I suppose my best bet (without going through the complication of making a dual detent) is to have a washer/o-ring-in-a-compression-fitting style detent that will support the BB uniformly.
edit: in line with the above paragraph, plan B:
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
- Gun Freak
- Lieutenant 5
- Posts: 4971
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2010 4:38 pm
- Location: Florida
- Been thanked: 8 times
Looks ok, when will testing begin? I am using the same principle on my detent bbmg. The problem is when I give it too little flow there is not enough air to seat a bb in the detent, but when I give it enough, the ROF is really high.
OG Anti-Hybrid
One man's trash is a true Spudder's treasure!
Golf Ball Cannon "Superna" ■ M16 BBMG ■ Pengun ■ Hammer Valve Airsoft Sniper ■ High Pressure .22 Coax
Holy Shat!
One man's trash is a true Spudder's treasure!
Golf Ball Cannon "Superna" ■ M16 BBMG ■ Pengun ■ Hammer Valve Airsoft Sniper ■ High Pressure .22 Coax
Holy Shat!
- jackssmirkingrevenge
- Five Star General
- Posts: 26203
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
- Has thanked: 569 times
- Been thanked: 345 times
The "tube fed" coniguration means the BBs don't have to be agitated as much a cloud design to feed into the detent so low flow isn't much of a problem.Gun Freak wrote:The problem is when I give it too little flow there is not enough air to seat a bb in the detent, but when I give it enough, the ROF is really high.
Testing due later today, watch this space.
edit: ah, much better, you can see the individual projectile impacts at 420 frames per second:
[youtube][/youtube]
Last edited by jackssmirkingrevenge on Fri Nov 02, 2018 5:48 am, edited 1 time in total.
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
- Gun Freak
- Lieutenant 5
- Posts: 4971
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2010 4:38 pm
- Location: Florida
- Been thanked: 8 times
Nice, so it slowed the ROF down?
OG Anti-Hybrid
One man's trash is a true Spudder's treasure!
Golf Ball Cannon "Superna" ■ M16 BBMG ■ Pengun ■ Hammer Valve Airsoft Sniper ■ High Pressure .22 Coax
Holy Shat!
One man's trash is a true Spudder's treasure!
Golf Ball Cannon "Superna" ■ M16 BBMG ■ Pengun ■ Hammer Valve Airsoft Sniper ■ High Pressure .22 Coax
Holy Shat!
- jackssmirkingrevenge
- Five Star General
- Posts: 26203
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
- Has thanked: 569 times
- Been thanked: 345 times
Very nicely, you can see the delay between holes in the coffee can quite clearly.Gun Freak wrote:Nice, so it slowed the ROF down?
The problem is that the elbow is causing some jams, I'm going to have to re-do it in the same configuration as the original with an inline fitting for the barrel.
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
- jackssmirkingrevenge
- Five Star General
- Posts: 26203
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
- Has thanked: 569 times
- Been thanked: 345 times
How did you figure that, goes through both sides of the coffee can as if they weren't thereJDP12 wrote:Power's a little weak
Somewhere close to 800 psi, if I tighten the fitting further the BB just seals up and doesn't fire.do you have any idea what pressure it is approximately "popping" at?
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
My bad, looked like it was merely denting. Couldn't tell.
That's good. I may have to try this with my HPA BBMG, as an o-ring detent seems alot more air efficient for reasons you mentioned about regarding sealing.
Are you satisfied with the performance other than slight jamming issues?
That's good. I may have to try this with my HPA BBMG, as an o-ring detent seems alot more air efficient for reasons you mentioned about regarding sealing.
Are you satisfied with the performance other than slight jamming issues?
- jackssmirkingrevenge
- Five Star General
- Posts: 26203
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
- Has thanked: 569 times
- Been thanked: 345 times
Actually you have a point, the first shot bounced off the can, but the rest were straight through penetrations. What seems to affect power with detent mechanisms is how quickly the next round follows the first into the breech, because effectively the delay between one projectile fiting and the next one sticking in the detent is the "valve dwell time".JDP12 wrote:My bad, looked like it was merely denting. Couldn't tell.
Very much, I'm confident that remaking it with an inline fitting will solve those issues. If I can make it a tad quieter it's going on the sentry turretAre you satisfied with the performance other than slight jamming issues?
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life
- jackssmirkingrevenge
- Five Star General
- Posts: 26203
- Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:28 pm
- Has thanked: 569 times
- Been thanked: 345 times
A couple of feet from the cans, haven't tried it further away but over 10 yards there shouldn't be too much energy lost, and I don't intend to use the sentry much further than that. I'll do a couple of longer range tests once I have it working reliably.JDP12 wrote:how far away was the muzzle from the cans? Have you tried any distance shooting-- say 10 yards or so?
Edit: version 3 curing, testing due tomorrow:
hectmarr wrote:You have to make many weapons, because this field is long and short life